were still in force, but that you?
had
learnt that the Secretary of State for
Foreign Affairs
AÅTEď
of opinion that they
ivere not in force at present. That Sir. E.
Grey
considered that they would have remained. in force in the case
of prisoners who were sent to underge imprisonment in Hong Kong
:under the provisions of the Order-in-Council of 1865 but that he added that that question did not
-now arise as it was understood that the oldest nowarise
Sentence at
4 present being served dated back only to September, 1907, ic. to a date subsequent to the issue of the second Order in Council.
That Mr Fiddes was Therefore to request us to take the papers into our consideration and to report whether in our
opinion the Royal Letters takent of the 22 of October 1866 were still in force.
Copy went to PD
3_1
C0.
ド
Acce
C538
3046
REGE 29 JAN 12
I have taken the papers into
consideration, and, in obedience to.
commands, have the honour.
your to Report
That in our opinion
the Letters Falent of 22nd October 1866, though still in force to the extent of their application, are no longer effective to enable the prerogative of pardon to be exercised by the Governor of Hong Kong in the case of ull &
کہ گر
persons .
Med
Partle
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.